Winter finch forecast
written by Drew Weber

- Image via Wikipedia
Here is Ron Pittaway's Winter Finch Forecast for 2008 - 2009. Every year Ron writes up a prediction of finch(plus a few others) irruptions based on mast production and where these birds will have to go for food.
GENERAL FORECAST
This winter's theme is where will crossbills go and will they irrupt south? Both species wandered widely this summer. Cone crops are poor in the Atlantic Provinces and fair to moderate in Western Canada. In Ontario, spruce crops are fair to good west and east of Lake Superior and in central Ontario such as Algonquin Park, but cone abundance diminishes rapidly northwards into the boreal forest. White pine (Ontario's provincial tree) has heavy cone crops in most areas. The hemlock crop is poor in central Ontario. The white birch crop is fair to good west and east of Lake Superior to Lake Ontario, but poor in the boreal forest. The mountain-ash (rowan berry) crop is excellent in Ontario and Western Canada, but poor in the Atlantic Provinces. Individual finch forecasts below apply mainly to Ontario, but adjacent provinces and states may find the forecast of interest. I also comment on three irruptive passerines and two boreal forest raptors.
INDIVIDUAL FINCH FORECASTS
Pine Grosbeak: A mountain-ash berry specialist in winter, Pine Grosbeaks will stay north of most birders this winter because mountain-ash berries are abundant in northern Ontario. A few normally get south to Algonquin Park, but they are unlikely farther south.
Purple Finch: This finch stays in the north only when most tree species have heavy seed crops. This fall most Purple Finches will migrate south out of the province because overall tree seed crops are too low. A very few may winter in southern Ontario.
Red Crossbill: This crossbill comprises nine ecotypes in North America; each has cone(s) preferences related to bill size and shape. The Types are difficult to identify in the field. Types 2 and 3 and probably 4 occur in Ontario. The white pine Type 2 is apparently the most frequently encountered Red Crossbill in the province (Simard 2007 in Atlas of Breeding Birds of Ontario). Since white pine has abundant crops in most areas, expect Type 2s to be widespread in small numbers. Hemlock Type 3 (subspecies sitkensis of AOU Check-list 1957) prefers the small cones of hemlock and white spruce when bumper in Ontario. Type 3s should be absent from the province this winter because the hemlock crop is poor and the white spruce crop is average. Other Types are possible this winter given the bumper white pine cone crop and good crop on red pine. The Red Crossbill complex very much needs further study.
White-winged Crossbill: This crossbill wandered widely this past summer searching for extensive spruce cone crops. Reports came from Alaska, Yukon, Hudson Bay Lowlands, Ontario, Quebec and many northern states such as Michigan and New York. Most kept moving but some stopped and their singing suggested nesting but spruce cone crops are generally not large enough in most areas to support major nestings. The White-winged Crossbill specializes on the small soft cones of black and white spruces and hemlock when bumper in Ontario. This winter they should be widespread in small numbers in traditional areas such as Algonquin Park. However, spruce cone crops are generally low in most of Canada and as seed supplies are exhausted this fall and winter so a moderate southward irruption is probable, perhaps extending south into the central United States. Watch for them on ornamental spruces and European larch.
Common and Hoary Redpolls: The Common Redpoll is a white birch seed specialist in the boreal forest in winter. White birch crops are poor in the northern two-thirds of the boreal forest, but seed abundance increases southward. In central Ontario, such as Algonquin Park, crops on white and yellow birches range from fair to good. It is uncertain whether the birch crop is large enough to stop the southward movement in central Ontario about latitude 45 degrees. Some redpolls, including a few Hoarys, may get south to Lake Ontario if birch seed supplies run low.
Pine Siskin: A conifer seed specialist in winter, most siskins should leave the province this fall because the spruce cone crop is poor in the boreal forest. It is uncertain whether the huge white pine seed crop will keep some siskins in central and northern Ontario this winter.
Evening Grosbeak: A conifer and hardwood seed generalist in winter, Evening Grosbeaks should make a small southward movement this winter because food supplies are probably sufficient in the north. Older birders remember the 1970s when the Evening Grosbeak was a common feeder bird. Their memory is based on the greatly inflated numbers 30 years ago in Eastern Canada due to huge outbreaks of spruce budworm. The last Algonquin Christmas Bird Count to have high numbers of Evening Grosbeaks was in 1984 with 1474 individuals, which was the North American CBC record that year. A significant decline in grosbeak numbers began in the mid-1980s because the size of annual budworm outbreaks decreased. Ontario's breeding population is currently probably stable, subject to periodic fluctuations in spruce budworm (Hoar 2007 in Atlas of Breeding Birds of Ontario).
THREE IRRUPTIVE PASSERINES
Red-breasted Nuthatch: Movements of this nuthatch are linked to cone crop abundance, particularly spruce, white pine and balsam fir in Ontario. Good numbers of Red-breasted Nuthatches should winter in Ontario this year feeding on the bumper white pine seed crop and good spruce/fir crops in many areas such as Algonquin Park.
Bohemian Waxwing: Like the Pine Grosbeak, this waxwing is a mountain-ash berry specialist in winter. Mountain-ash crops are excellent across northern Ontario (bumper around Lake Superior) so very few Bohemians will wander out of the boreal forest this winter. Some may get south into traditional wintering areas of central Ontario such as Orillia, Peterborough and Ottawa where European mountain-ash berries are in good supply.
Blue Jay: Good numbers of jays will winter in central Ontario because the red oak acorn crop is good and beechnut crop is fair in central Ontario. Many other fruits and berries are abundant. Therefore this fall's flight should be average or smaller along the shorelines of Lakes Ontario and Erie.
BOREAL RAPTORS
Northern Goshawk: A small flight is possible this fall because high snowshoe hare populations have declined in much of northern Ontario. However, grouse numbers (Ruffed, Spruce, Sharp-tailed) are generally good so they may buffer the decline in hares.
Boreal Owl: Small mammal populations have crashed across northern and central Ontario. In Quebec, Pascal Cote of Observatoire d'oiseaux de Tadoussac expects a flight of Boreal Owls this fall and winter following their 4 year cycle linked to red-backed voles. Southern Ontario may get Boreal Owls and other northern forest owls this winter.
WHERE TO SEE FINCHES:
A winter trip to Algonquin Park is a birding adventure. The park is a mix of boreal and hardwood habitats only a three hour drive north of Toronto. Kilometre distances are marked from the west entrance. Watch carefully for crossbills and other finches in early morning eating road salt and sand. Two excellent birding spots are the Spruce Bog Trail at km 42.5 and the gate area on the Opeongo Road about 4 km north from km 46 on the highway. Watch and listen for finches, Gray Jay, Boreal Chickadee, Spruce Grouse and Black-backed Woodpecker. The Visitor Centre and restaurant at km 43 are open only on weekends in winter. An observation deck overlooks a spectacular bog and black spruce forest. The feeders attract Evening Grosbeak, Pine Grosbeak, Common Redpoll and other finches depending on the winter. Gray Jays frequent the suet feeder and sometimes a pine marten or fisher goes to the suet. Eastern Canadian Wolves (Canis lycaon) are seen occasionally from the observation deck feeding on road-killed moose put out by park staff. Arrangements can be made to view feeders on weekdays. For information call the Visitor Centre at 613-637-2828.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: I thank staff of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) and birders whose reports allow me to make annual forecasts: Dennis Barry (Durham Region), Ken Corston (OMNR Moosonee), Pascal Cote (Tadoussac, Quebec), Shirley Davidson (OMNR Minden), Bruce Di Labio (Ottawa to Moosonee), Carrolle Eady (Dryden), Cameron Eckert (Yukon), Bruce Falls (Brodie Club, Toronto), Brian Fox (OMNR), Marcel Gahbauer (Alberta), Michel Gosselin (Canadian Museum of Nature), Skye Haas (Michigan), Charity Hendry (Ontario Tree Seed Plant), Leo Heyens (OMNR Kenora), Tyler Hoar (Laurentians and Northeastern Quebec), Peter Hynard (Haliburton County), Jean Iron (Northeastern Ontario/James Bay), Christine Kerrigan and Peter Nevin (Parry Sound District), Richard Pope (Lake Superior), Bruce Mactavish (Newfoundland), Erwin Meissner (West Sudbury District), Scott McPherson (OMNR), Brian Naylor (OMNR North Bay), Larry Neily (Ottawa), Stephen O'Donnell (Parry Sound District), Fred Pinto (OMNR), Betsy Potter (Wilson, New York), Gord Ross (OMNR Moosonee), Rick Salmon (OMNR Nipigon), Don Sutherland (OMNR), Eve Ticknor (Ottawa), Ron Tozer (Algonquin Park), Declan Troy (Alaska), Mike Turner (OMNR Minden), Stan Vasiliauskas (OMNR), Mike Walsh (OMNR Muskoka/Parry Sound), Ben Walters (Northeastern Ontario), Alan Wormington (Point Pelee), Matt Young whose posts on New York State listservs were informative, and Kirk Zufelt (Sault Ste Marie). I thank Ron Tozer for ongoing discussions on winter finches and Jean Iron for proofing the forecast.
PREVIOUS FINCH FORECASTS archived at Larry Neily's website. The recently published ATLAS OF BREEDING BIRDS OF ONTARIO 2007 has detailed peer-reviewed information and maps on boreal winter finches. I highly recommend it. Ron Pittaway Minden and Toronto ON 18 September 2008

What a Vice President Palin would mean for birds
written by Drew Weber
Image by bobster1985 via Flickr Now that John McCain has picked a running mate, Sarah Palin, it is a good time to take a look at what a Republican victory this fall might mean for birds and wildlife.
Endangered Species
For some time now, the Republican party has not been particularly friendly to the conservation agenda. The Endangered Species Act has frequently been under attack from the current administration and has suffered a revision in 2004 that limited the impact of the law in protecting our most at-risk plants and animals (Eilperin 2004). A bright spot in the Bush administration's dealings with endangered species was considering the listing of the polar bear.
It didn't take Sarah Palin long to act against this positive step. In a lawsuit against the federal government, Palin's administration argued that,
"Listing the polar bear as a threatened species [under the Endangered Species Act] will have a significant adverse impact on Alaska because. . . [it] will deter activities such as commercial fisheries, oil and gas exploration and development, transportation, and tourism." (Rood 2008)
The Endangered Species Act has been crucial to the recovery of several bird species including the Bald Eagle and Peregrine Falcon, and the continuing success of Whooping Cranes and Kirtland's Warblers. If Sarah Palin can't support listing polar bears, there is no hope she would embrace using the act as it was intended, protecting endangered species from development and environment degradation.
Climate Change
Palin discounted the most recent findings of the U.S. Geological Survey that found that polar bears are threatened by global warming and will likely be extinct before this century ends. In fact, she refuses to recognize humans role in influencing climate change.
The effects of climate change on birds have the potential to be devastating. Changes in food availablity, precipitation amounts and loss of habitat are some of the threats that a changing climate pose to birds, according to the Smithsonian.
The WWF says that the bird groups that are most at risk are seabirds and migratory birds as well as species that require mountain, island and wetland habitats. Scientists have noted population declines of up to 90% in some species as well as a complete reproductive failure in others (WWF 2006).
Special Interests
Palin has a history for sticking up for oil, big business and special interests at the expense of animals and the environment.
Palin has strongly promoted oil and natural gas resource development in Alaska, including in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge. These areas are vital for the many species of birds that breed in the wildlife refuge and on the north slope area of Alaska. More oil drilling operations will inevitably result in more spills and environmental degradation. Palin already has a bad reputation in this area, refusing to push Exxon to pay the government for the environmental damage that occured when millions of gallons of oil were spilled into the ocean. The oil spill killed 300 Bald Eagles, 200,000 Common Murres, as well as whales, otters and many other seabirds.
Conclusion
Sarah Palin refuses to recognize several of the most severe threats facing wildlife and in particular, birds. The bottom line is that she has a history of giving priority to business interests at the expense of wildlife in almost every case. In fact, I could not find one positive thing Palin has ever done that benefitted wildlife. As Vice President, Palin would likely continue with her record of ignoring environmental impacts and scientific studies, similar to the current administration. She may even be a step backwards for conservation as many of her positions seem more extreme than the current administrations. Sarah Palin would be a disaster for the environment and by extension, birds. Let's hope it never comes to that.
Sources:
Sanderling on mud
written by Drew Weber
A few days ago at Conejohela Flats, I was treated to my first Sanderling in Pennsylvania. Soon after we landed on the flats it was running around with a Whimbrel, similar to the Buff-breasted Sandpiper the day before.
I am used to seeing flocks of Sanderlings on the shore, chasing waves back and forth as they feed. It is quite another thing to watch one loafing around in the middle of PA on a muddy island, with no waves. The Sanderling seemed pretty content to stick around, lounging around all day in pretty much the same location.
The Sanderling was actually a bit difficult to digiscope. Most of my photos ended up nicely focused except for the head, which was always moving. It was in constant motion, foraging in the drier mud and pulling out worms. Its very sturdy bill enables it to probe in harder mud for prey. In a study of foraging flocks of Sanderlings in New Jersey, the Sanderlings spent 65% of their time actively searching for food and 35% probing, gleaning and pecking (Morton 1996).
Sanderlings have been known to live up to 13 years (Boates and McNeil 1984). Based on broad-scale surveys, the N.A. population of Sanderlings is roughly 300,000 individuals (Morrison et al. 2000). The number of Sanderlings along the Atlantic flyway is estimated to have decreased by 80% in the last 30 years. The biggest threats to Sanderlings are human disturbance, habitat loss and the associated loss of food.
Sources:
1984. Longevity record for the Sanderling. J. Field Ornithol. 55: 485.
2000. Population estimates of Nearctic shorebirds. Waterbirds 23: 337–352.
1996. Effects of human disturbance on the behavior and energetics of nonbreeding Sanderlings. Ph.D. diss., Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg.
The Nature Conservancy. Sanderling. http://www.nature.org/initiatives/programs/birds/sibley/animals/art5632.html. Accessed 9/7/08.
Skywatch Friday
written by Drew Weber

Here is a shot of an Osprey I digiscoped. I haven't had too much success digiscoping flying birds but at least this one is identifiable.














